Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Skucas, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gorski, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Skucas, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gorski, J. W.

Radiology, Vol 118, 433-437, Copyright © 1976 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Comparison of the image quality of 105mm film with conventional film

J Skucas and JW Gorski

The contrast, resolution, geometric, and motion unsharpness, mottle, and overall impression of 105mm film were compared to these quantities in conventional spot film. It is believed that conventional filming is superior for low contrast objects and cooperative patients whereas with uncooperative, obese patients, the 105mm filming modality would decrease motion unsharpness.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1976 by the Radiological Society of North America.