Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fu, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ray, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fu, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ray, J. W.

Radiology, Vol 119, 209-213, Copyright © 1976 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Time, dose and volume factors in interstitial Radium implants of carcinoma of the oral tongue

KK Fu, EK Chan, TL Phillips and JW Ray

In a retrospective computer dosimetry analysis of 58 patients with carcinoma of the oral tongue treated with interstitial radium implants alone or in combination with external irradiation, dose and volume appear to be the most important factors in both local control and the incidence of necrosis; in the dose rate range commonly used in clinical interstitial radiotherapy, dose rate has no significant effect. The optimal minimum tumor doses for local control vary with the size of the primary lesion: 6,000 rads for T1 lesions and 6,500 rads for T2 lesions treated with interstitial radium implants alone and 7,500 rads for lesions treated with interstitial radium implants in combination with external irradiation. For lesions treated with implants plus external irradiation, greater local control was achieved when most of the dose was delivered through the interstitial implants. For a given volume, the incidence of necrosis was directly proportional to the degree of overdosage; for a given dose, the incidence of necrosis was directly proportional to the volume receiving the dose.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1976 by the Radiological Society of North America.