Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haughton, V. M.
Right arrow Articles by Unger, G. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haughton, V. M.
Right arrow Articles by Unger, G. F.

Radiology, Vol 125, 731-733, Copyright © 1977 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Arachnoiditis following myelography with water-soluble agents. The role of contrast medium osmolality

VM Haughton, KC Ho and GF Unger

The role of contrast medium osmolality in postmyelographic arachnoiditis was studied. Monkeys were injected intrathecally with isotonic saline (290 mOs/kg), hypertonic saline (1,449 mOs/kg), metrizamide (456 or 300 mOs/kg), or methylglucamine iocarnate (1,049 mOs/kg). After 12 weeks the animals were examined for evidence of arachnoiditis, with myelography just prior to sacrifice and microscopic examination of the excised dural sac and its contents. Intrathecal injections of methyglucamine iocarmate or metrizamide caused arachnoiditis while saline did not. Only one animal given 170 mg l/ml (300 mOs/kg) exhibited a more severe reaction than the controls. An increase in the cerebrospinal fluid osmolality alone does not cause arachnoiditis.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1977 by the Radiological Society of North America.