|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 128, 89-94, Copyright © 1978 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
LA deSantos, HM Goldstein, JA Murray and S Wallace
In a study of 62 musculoskeletal neoplasms, computed tomography contributed little to establishing tissue diagnosis. Its primary value lay in the assessment of intraosseous and/or extraosseous extent of disease. CT also established the presence or absence of disease in a small number of cases with clinically questionable findings. In most cases, conventional radiographic methods were superior in diagnosing musculoskeletal neoplasms.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. ADANI, M. CALOŇ, P. TORRICELLI, P. B. SQUARZINA, and A. CAROLI The Value of Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Soft-Tissue Swellings of the Hand J Hand Surg Eur Vol., April 1, 1990; 15(2): 229 - 232. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. R. CLAY and S. AUSTIN Idiopathic Thenar Muscle Hypertrophy J Hand Surg Eur Vol., February 1, 1988; 13(1): 100 - 101. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |