Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kido, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Schnur, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kido, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Schnur, J.

Radiology, Vol 128, 371-375, Copyright © 1978 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Comparative sensitivity of CT scans, radiographs and radionuclide bone scans in detecting metastatic calvarial lesions

DK Kido, R Gould, F Taati, A Duncan and J Schnur

CT scans of 100 patients with histologically diagnosed extracerebral neoplasms were reviewed and compared with either radionuclide bone images or skull radiographs. The results of this correlative study indicate that CT scans are more sensitive than skull radiographs in detecting corresponding calvarial lesions; conversely, radionuclide bone scans appear to be more sensitive than CT in detecting similar lesions.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JCOHome page
T. Hamaoka, J. E. Madewell, D. A. Podoloff, G. N. Hortobagyi, and N. T. Ueno
Bone Imaging in Metastatic Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., July 15, 2004; 22(14): 2942 - 2953.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1978 by the Radiological Society of North America.