Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holder, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Dalrymple, G. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holder, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Dalrymple, G. V.

Radiology, Vol 128, 787-788, Copyright © 1978 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Choosing a contrast material for aortofemoral runoff angiography

JC Holder and GV Dalrymple

Aortofemoral runoff angiography was performed 63 times in a total of 21 patients, each of whom was injected three times with different contrast materials (60% methylglucamine iothalamate, 78%) sodium methylglucamine iothalamate, and 76% sodium methylglucamine diatrizoate). Neither the examiner nor the patient was aware which contrast material was being given. Significantly fewer patients reported severe injection pain with methylglucamine iothalamate than with the other two agents.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1978 by the Radiological Society of North America.