Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chafetz, N.
Right arrow Articles by Filly, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chafetz, N.
Right arrow Articles by Filly, R. A.

Radiology, Vol 130, 725-728, Copyright © 1979 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Portal and hepatic veins: accuracy of margin echoes for distinguishing intrahepatic vessels

N Chafetz and RA Filly

One hundred randomly selected sonograms were retrospectively reviewed to determine the accuracy of employing the margin characteristics of intrahepatic venous radicals to distinguish portal from hepatic veins; 99% of intrahepatic portal veins demonstrated high amplitude acoustic margins. However, one or more hepatic veins also had high amplitude acoustic margins in 29% of patients in whom intraparenchymal hepatic veins were identified. The authors conclude that an intrahepatic venous structure without an echogenic border is almost invariably an hepatic vein, although other anatomical features should be considered for proper classification of intrahepatic venous structures which demonstrate high amplitude echoes surrounding the lumen.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1979 by the Radiological Society of North America.