|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 132, 265-271, Copyright © 1979 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
HL Kundel
Technical and diagnostic image quality are distinguished and the limitations of three methods currently used for assessing diagnostic image quality are discussed. They are evaluations based on individual clinical experience, measurement of diagnostic performance, and physical measurements made on images or imaging systems. Finally, a psychophysical approach to image quality evaluation is presented and its potential value discussed.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M Bath and L G Mansson Visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis: a non-parametric rank-invariant statistical method for image quality evaluation Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2007; 80(951): 169 - 176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Suryanarayanan, A. Karellas, S. Vedantham, H. Ved, S. P. Baker, and C. J. D'Orsi Flat-Panel Digital Mammography System: Contrast-Detail Comparison between Screen-Film Radiographs and Hard-Copy Images Radiology, December 1, 2002; 225(3): 801 - 807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Potchen, T. G. Cooper, A. E. Sierra, G. R. Aben, M. J. Potchen, M. G. Potter, and J. E. Siebert Measuring Performance in Chest Radiography Radiology, November 1, 2000; 217(2): 456 - 459. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |