Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haus, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Bencomo, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haus, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Bencomo, J.

Radiology, Vol 133, 223-226, Copyright © 1979 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Magnification mammography: evaluation of screen-film and xeroradiographic techniques

AG Haus, DD Paulus, GD Dodd, RW Cowart and J Bencomo

An x-ray unit designed for conventional nonmagnification and magnification mammography has been evaluated in terms of image quality and corresponding radiation exposure levels. The technical advantages of the radiographic magnification technique can result in improved image quality and reduction of the recording-system noise. The microfocal spot allows 1.5 x magnification mammograms with minimal geometric unsharpness. However, the magnification technique requires an increased radiation dose to the breast, compared to conventional nonmagnification techniques. An additional radiation dose may be required for screen-film magnification views because of reciprocity law failure due to long exposure times. The increased-dose limitation and the small dimensions of the recording-system cassettes have precluded the use of magnification in place of nonmagnified images for routine mammographic examination. The magnification technique has proved to be beneficial in selected cases.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1979 by the Radiological Society of North America.