Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Amberg, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bates, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Amberg, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bates, M.

Radiology, Vol 134, 31-32, Copyright © 1980 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Comparison of oral cholecystopaques: iopronic acid vs. iopanoic acid

JR Amberg, LA Goldberger and M Bates

A new oral cholecystopaque, iopronic acid, was compared to iopanoic acid. This was a double blind, randomized study of 260 subjects. A 4.5- G dose of iopronic acid produced a similar degree of gallbladder opacification as 3.0 g of iopanoic acid. Adverse reactions to the contrast media were generally mild, but were significantly less with iopronic acid. The present study is criticized because it was not designed to help the radiologist determine the better contrast medium under optimal clinical conditions.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1980 by the Radiological Society of North America.