|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 139, 113-118, Copyright © 1981 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
BJ McNeil, J Hanley, HH Funkenstein and C Rumbaugh
Data were prospectively collected on the signs, symptoms, and physical findings in 2,225 patients who underwent computed tomography (CT) of the head in a tertiary care teaching hospital. These data were correlated with the results of CT in an attempt to identify evidence of inappropriate utilization of diagnostic cranial CT. If only those patients had been examined whose presenting complaints were statistically more often seen in patients with abnormal CT studies than in those with normal CT studies, 26% of all examinations would have been eliminated, but 18% of all abnormal patients would have been missed. Similarly, if only those patients who were thought by their physicians to have a high likelihood of intracranial disease or to be diagnostic dilemmas had been examined, 34% of all examinations and 26% of all abnormal CT studies would have been eliminated. It is concluded that, in the setting studied here, there is no evidence of inappropriate utilization of cranial CT for diagnostic purposes.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Wijesinha, C. B. Begg, H. H. Funkenstein, and B. J. McNeil Methodology for the Differential Diagnosis of a Complex Data Set: A Case Study Using Data from Routine CT Scan Examinations Med Decis Making, January 1, 1983; 3(2): 133 - 154. [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |