Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gomes, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Buffkin, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gomes, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Buffkin, D.

Radiology, Vol 142, 719-728, Copyright © 1982 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Contrast venography vs. radionuclide venography: a study of discrepancies and their possible significance

AS Gomes, MM Webber and D Buffkin

In 51 instances, patients underwent radionuclide venography with technetium 99m-labeled macroaggregated albumin followed by contrast venography. The criteria used for diagnosis of a positive radionuclide venogram (flow pattern and retention of radionuclide) were evaluated. Cases in which there were discrepancies between the two studies were analyzed. Multiple factors were found to result in a lack of correlation between the two studies. These are: failure to recognize nonfilling of the deep venous system on the radionuclide venogram, disparate distribution of the venographic imaging agents, presence of varicose veins, large venous valves, previous femoral venipuncture, postsurgical narrowing with obstruction, age of the thrombus, and other factors. These factors and their implications with respect to venographic technique are discussed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
B. Caner, M. Ozmen, A. Dincer, O. Kapucu, and C. Bekdik
Detection of Deep Vein Thrombosis: Combined Flow and Blood Pool Radionuclide Venography vs Contrast Venography
Angiology, October 1, 1991; 42(10): 796 - 804.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
S. R. Shackford and K. M. Moser
Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism in Trauma Patients
J Intensive Care Med, March 1, 1988; 3(2): 87 - 98.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1982 by the Radiological Society of North America.