Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carter, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Brady, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carter, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Brady, T. J.

Radiology, Vol 145, 447-451, Copyright © 1982 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Relative accuracy of two diagnostic schemes for detection of pulmonary embolism by ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy

WD Carter, TM Brady, JW Keyes Jr, JH Thrall, JB Greenhouse, DR Biello, BA Siegel, PO Alderson and TJ Brady

Two diagnostic schemes for detection of pulmonary embolism by ventilation-perfusion (V-P) scintigraphy were compared for relative accuracy by two groups of observers interpreting 70 V-P scintiscans. Observers in Group B, who used the criteria recently proposed by Biello et al., had a significantly smaller average number of "indeterminate" interpretations (41%) than did the observers in Group A (55%), who used a simpler scheme (p less than 0.05). In addition, Group B showed a slight improvement in positive predictive value without a deterioration in the negative predictive value compared with Group A. Along with this improvement in diagnostic performance, Group B achieved a significant reduction in interobserver variability compared with Group A for patients without pulmonary embolism (p less than 0.05). There was no significant difference in interobserver variability between the two groups for patients with pulmonary embolism. The diagnostic scheme introduced by Biello et al. represents a useful improvement for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism by V-P imaging.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Patel and E. A. Kazerooni
Helical CT for the Evaluation of Acute Pulmonary Embolism
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2005; 185(1): 135 - 149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
D. L. Simel, J. R. Feussner, E. R. Delong, and D. B. Matchar
Intermediate, Indeterminate, and Uninterpretable Diagnostic Test Results
Med Decis Making, June 1, 1987; 7(2): 107 - 114.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1982 by the Radiological Society of North America.