Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Potish, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Khan, F. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Potish, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Khan, F. M.

Radiology, Vol 145, 479-483, Copyright © 1982 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

The relationship between milligram-hours and dose to point A in carcinoma of the cervix

RA Potish, FC Deibel Jr and FM Khan

The relationships between the Fletcher and Manchester methods in dosimetry of cancer of the uterine cervix were explored in order to compare dose prescriptions between the systems, to optimize the best features of both systems, and to establish the necessity for computerized dosimetry. A total of 91 Fletcher-Suit radium applications was analyzed by a linear least-square regression analysis to compare Point A and Point B doses of the Manchester system will milligram-hours of the fletcher system. Although moderately high correlations were found between milligram-hours of radium and doses at Point A and Point B, it was concluded that direct comparisons, particularly between individual patients, are fraught with dose uncertainties of clinical significance. In addition, the correlation between milligram-hours of radium and Point A dose was markedly affected by the position of the colpostats and tandem, thus making it difficult to formulate a simple conversion factor between the two systems.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1982 by the Radiological Society of North America.