Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clouse, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Costello, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clouse, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Costello, P.

Radiology, Vol 147, 407-411, Copyright © 1983 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Peripheral hepatic artery embolization for primary and secondary hepatic neoplasms

ME Clouse, RG Lee, EJ Duszlak, JJ Lokich, C Trey, MR Alday, DC Yoburn, J Diamond, AW Crosson and P Costello

Eighteen patients underwent peripheral arterial embolization with Gelfoam powder for treatment of primary or metastatic hepatic neoplasms. Except for two cases in which the patients could not undergo long-term arterial infusion, all cases were treatment failures from intravenous chemotherapy, intra-arterial chemotherapy, or, in some cases, intra-arterial chemotherapy plus radiation therapy. Fourteen patients had good symptomatic relief from the procedure. Four of these patients are alive at 3, 5, 6, and 18 months following the procedure. Four patients died within 2 weeks following embolization, three of progression of disease and one of aspiration pneumonia. Of the patients showing symptomatic relief, 10 died of progression of cancer 2 to 14 months following embolization, with a median survival of 5 months. Based on the results in this small group of patients, it would seem that transcatheter hepatic dearterialization is often successful palliative therapy in patients who are not responsive to traditional therapies. Because of the low procedural morbidity, transcatheter embolization is superior to surgical dearterialization.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y.-C. Lin, J.-H. Chen, K.-W. Han, and W.-C. Shen
Ablation of Liver Tumor by Injection of Hypertonic Saline
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2005; 184(1): 212 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
K. Stuart
Chemoembolization in the Management of Liver Tumors
Oncologist, October 1, 2003; 8(5): 425 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. P. McGahan and G. D. Dodd III
Radiofrequency Ablation of the Liver: Current Status
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2001; 176(1): 3 - 16.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1983 by the Radiological Society of North America.