Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lang, E. K.
Right arrow Articles by Price, E. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lang, E. K.
Right arrow Articles by Price, E. T.

Radiology, Vol 147, 419-426, Copyright © 1983 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Redefinitions of indications for percutaneous nephrostomy

EK Lang and ET Price

An analysis of treatment response in 215 patients treated by percutaneous nephrostomy identified obstruction of the urinary tract, complicated by infection and sometimes gram-negative septicemia, as the single most important indication for this intervention. Percutaneous nephrostomy reduced the mortality from gram-negative septicemia from 40% to 8%. Similarly, the length of hospitalization for patients with severe infection complicating urinary tract obstruction was reduced by half in the group undergoing percutaneous nephrostomy. In 43 patients with longstanding obstruction, percutaneous nephrostomy was used to predict recoverable renal function based on the response of renal plasma flow rate to decompression. In 13 patients, percutaneous nephrostomies were used either for the introduction of solvents to dissolve calculi or to serve as pathways for their extraction. Percutaneous nephrostomies in 21 patients were expanded to serve as points of entry for the placement of stent catheters to treat fistulas or bougie catheters to dilate and subsequently catheterize ureteral strictures. While six serious complications were encountered, five of these might have been prevented by meticulous adherence to proper technique.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Thomas, S. R. Turner, R. C. Nelson, and E. K. Paulson
Postprocedure Sepsis in Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Hepatic Abscess Drainage: How Often Does It Occur?
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2006; 186(5): 1419 - 1422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. P. Tamm, P. M. Silverman, and W. P. Shuman
Evaluation of the Patient with Flank Pain and Possible Ureteral Calculus
Radiology, August 1, 2003; 228(2): 319 - 329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1983 by the Radiological Society of North America.