Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Widrich, W. C.
Right arrow Articles by Newman, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Widrich, W. C.
Right arrow Articles by Newman, T.

Radiology, Vol 148, 61-64, Copyright © 1983 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Iopamidol and meglumine diatrizoate: comparison of effects on patient discomfort during aortofemoral arteriography

WC Widrich, CF Beckman, AH Robbins, FJ Scholz, MK Srinivasan, EJ Hayes, CD Kellum and T Newman

Iopamidol was compared with Renografin-60 (meglumine diatrizoate, Squibb) in a controlled, randomized double-blind study of 40 patients undergoing peripheral arteriography for arteriosclerotic occlusive disease to determine which agent caused less discomfort. Each patient was evaluated for objective signs of discomfort and subjective feelings of pain and heat. Monitoring was achieved by multiple physical examinations, chemical tests, electrocardiograms, and intra-arterial pressure recordings. It is concluded that iopamidol is safe and causes significantly less patient discomfort than Renografin-60.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
D. Dacoronias, P. Minguzzi, U. Ugolotti, and A.G. Dettori
Iomeprol vs Iopamidol in Intraarterial Peripheral Digital Subtraction Angiography
Angiology, September 1, 1992; 43(9): 734 - 740.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1983 by the Radiological Society of North America.