Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hewes, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Freiberger, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hewes, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Freiberger, R. H.

Radiology, Vol 148, 69-72, Copyright © 1983 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Percutaneous bone biopsy: the importance of aspirated osseous blood

RC Hewes, VJ Vigorita and RH Freiberger

The diagnostic value of the microscopic examination of bone core specimen versus osseous blood, obtained by 110 percutaneous biopsies performed on 100 patients, was evaluated. A diagnosis of malignancy was made by biopsy in 54 cases. In 52 cases in which osseous blood (clot and smears) was available for examination, a positive diagnosis for malignancy was made microscopically in 49 (94%). In 46 cases in which bone cores were studied separately, a microscopic diagnosis of malignancy was made from the bone core in 39 (85%). If osseous blood had not been available for examination only 39 (72%) of the 54 biopsies would have been positive for malignancy; the other 14 biopsies would have been classified as either negative or insufficient for diagnosis. In those biopsies where both bone cores and osseous blood were available, the osseous blood showed better malignant tissue morphology and was considered better diagnostic material in 19 cases, whereas bone cores were considered better diagnostic material in only three cases. Osseous blood, which is usually easily available in bone biopsies, is valuable diagnostic material; it should be treated as a tissue specimen and not discarded.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1983 by the Radiological Society of North America.