Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soini, I.
Right arrow Articles by Virtama, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soini, I.
Right arrow Articles by Virtama, P.

Radiology, Vol 148, 627-631, Copyright © 1983 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Double-contrast examination of the stomach: 100mm fluorography vs. full- size radiography

I Soini, A Kiuru, PJ Makela, M Varpula and P Virtama

Full-size radiographs and 100mm fluorographic spot views taken with an image intensifier were compared during double-contrast examination of the stomach. Differences in image quality between the two modalities were small; there was also a small decrease in absorbed dose, since fluoroscopy comprised more than half of the total dose. The authors recommend that 100mm spot views be used routinely in double-contrast examination of the stomach.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1983 by the Radiological Society of North America.