Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DiSessa, T. G.
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, W. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DiSessa, T. G.
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, W. F.

Radiology, Vol 148, 687-691, Copyright © 1983 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

The cardiovascular effects of metrizamide in infants

TG DiSessa, M Zednikova, S Hiraishi, JM Jarmakani, CB Higgins and WF Friedman

A prospective study was performed in 30 children under 3 years of age to compare the cardiovascular effects of a nonionic contrast material of low osmolality, metrizamide, with those of a conventional ionic contrast material, meglumine sodium diatrizoate. Left ventricular end- diastolic pressure, left ventricular peak systolic pressure, heart rate, echocardiographically obtained end-diastolic and end-systolic dimension, and blood chemistries were obtained before and after angiography. Neither contrast material changed serum sodium, potassium, or creatinine levels. However, serum osmolality rose significantly following injection of diatrizoate, but not metrizamide. Both end- diastolic and end-systolic dimensions increased after diatrizoate injection. However, end-diastolic dimension was unchanged and end- systolic dimension fell after metrizamide infusion. Both contrast materials raised left ventricular peak systolic pressure and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure after injection; the magnitude of these pressure changes was the same for both agents. Heart rate increased with diatrizoate to a significantly greater degree than with metrizamide. There was no difference in the quality of radiographic opacification. It is concluded that although the effects on intracardiac pressures are similar for both contrast materials, metrizamide may be advantageous in the critically ill infant because it causes a smaller increase in osmolality, fewer changes in cardiac dimensions, and a reduced heart rate challenge.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1983 by the Radiological Society of North America.