Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gunter, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by English, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gunter, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by English, D.

Radiology, Vol 149, 563-566, Copyright © 1983 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Neutrophil labeling with indium-111: tropolone vs. oxine

KP Gunter, JN Lukens, JA Clanton, PJ Morris, RL Janco and D English

This study was undertaken to compare tropolone with oxine (8-hydroxy- quinoline) for labeling human neutrophils with In-111. Exposure of neutrophils to tropolone at concentrations required for efficient labeling resulted in a marked impairment of chemotaxis. In contrast, no impairment of neutrophil chemotaxis was observed using In-111 oxine. Labeling efficiencies obtained with In-111 tropolone under optimal conditions were consistently less than those obtained with In-111 oxine. We evaluated cells labeled by the two methods using chemotaxis radioassay to assess the chemotatic potential of labeled cells. The results led to the conclusion that the oxine technique is preferable to tropolone for labeling human neutrophils with In-111.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1983 by the Radiological Society of North America.