Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woodring, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kryscio, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woodring, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kryscio, R. J.

Radiology, Vol 151, 15-21, Copyright © 1984 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Mediastinal hemorrhage: an evaluation of radiographic manifestations

JH Woodring, FK Loh and RJ Kryscio

Eleven common radiographic signs of mediastinal hemorrhage were evaluated by two observers for the following three patient groups: normal subjects, patients with mediastinal hemorrhage and no arterial injury, and patients with major thoracic arterial injury. Supine chest radiographs were studied in all cases. Four major conclusions can be made based upon these findings. M/C ratio (mediastinal width to chest width), tracheal deviation, left hemothorax, paraspinal line widening, and aorto-pulmonary window opacification do not reliably separate these three groups of patients. The diagnosis of mediastinal hemorrhage may be made if the aortic contour is abnormal or if one of the following signs is positive: abnormal mediastinal width, apical cap, widening of the right paratracheal stripe, or deviation of the nasogastric tube. If either the right paratracheal stripe is widened or the nasogastric tube is deviated, the diagnosis of aortic rupture can be made with a 24% probability; if both signs are negative, there is a 98% probability that aortic rupture is absent. Due to interobserver variation, there is good agreement between observers for the following four signs only: transverse mediastinal width, tracheal deviation, nasogastric tube deviation, and right paratracheal stripe widening.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
L. D. Madden, J. H. Cilley JR, R. C. Camishion, R. K. Spence, J. B. Alexander, S. E. Ross, and A. J. DelRossi
Traumatic Disruptions of the Aorta: Management of 20 Cases
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, July 1, 1990; 24(6): 419 - 423.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
F. Pinterits, F. Grabenwoeger, W. Dock, V. Metz, and W. Appel
Chest Radiograph in the Acute Traumatic Rupture of the Aorta
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, March 1, 1989; 23(2): 122 - 127.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1984 by the Radiological Society of North America.