Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Newhouse, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Pfister, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Newhouse, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Pfister, R. C.

Radiology, Vol 151, 319-322, Copyright © 1984 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Urinary obstruction: pitfalls in the use of delayed contrast material washout for diagnosis

JH Newhouse, ES Amis Jr and RC Pfister

Delayed washout of contrast material from the renal collecting system has been described as a reliable sign of urinary tract obstruction. However, this finding may appear in the absence of obstruction. Experiments were performed with cylinders containing meglumine iothalamate, which were perfused with water and imaged. The effects of (a) varying flow rate, (b) different volumes of the cylinders, and (c) presence of obstruction on the rate of contrast material washout were observed. In addition, postoperative urography and ureteral perfusion studies in 6 patients who had had ureteropelvic junction obstruction successfully treated by pyeloplasty were reviewed. In the experiments, it was found that changes in flow rate and volume of the reservoir affected contrast material washout; however, the presence of obstruction did not cause a delay in washout. Three of the 6 patients had delayed washout of contrast material on postoperative urographic studies, although ureteral perfusion studies had excluded obstruction. Additional mechanisms that may affect the washout of contrast material are discussed.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1984 by the Radiological Society of North America.