Radiology, Vol 152, 71-77, Copyright © 1984 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Magnetic resonance of the brain: the optimal screening technique

M Brant-Zawadzki, D Norman, TH Newton, WM Kelly, B Kjos, CM Mills, W Dillon, D Sobel and LE Crooks

Seventy consecutive patients were examined with magnetic resonance (MR) and computed tomography (CT) of the brain. Each study was independently reviewed. Focal abnormalities were detected by one or both modalities in 51 patients. Neoplastic, infectious, vascular, demyelinating, metabolic, and congenital disorders of the brain were included. The MR pulse sequence that best detected these abnormalities was a spin-echo multisection technique that used a long interval between RF excitations (TR = 1500 or 2000 msec). Forty-eight of 51 patients showed focal lesions with this technique. A supplementary MR pulse sequence with a short TR (500 msec) was useful in helping to characterize certain lesions with a long T1 relaxation component, but in 10 of 26 positive cases in which this sequence was added it would have missed the abnormality had it been the sole sequence used. MR missed focal lesions in 3 of 51 patients. These were lesions that required thin-section (1.5 mm) CT techniques. Two were intrasellar, and one was an intracanalicular neurinoma. In 17 of 48 patients, CT missed the focal lesion seen with MR. Based on this experience, it is concluded that the long TR multisection spin-echo sequence is the optimal MR screening technique for detection of most brain abnormalities, and is more sensitive than CT. Currently, CT remains the screening modality of choice when high-resolution, thin-section studies in the pituitary, inner ear, and orbital regions are indicated.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. E. Leeds and S. A. Kieffer Evolution of Diagnostic Neuroradiology from 1904 to 1999 Radiology, November 1, 2000; 217(2): 309 - 318. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. B. Moss Research in Alzheimer's disease: A progress report American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias, July 1, 1988; 3(4): 10 - 16. [PDF]