Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feczko, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ackerman, L. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feczko, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ackerman, L. V.

Radiology, Vol 152, 301-303, Copyright © 1984 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Small colonic polyps: a reappraisal of their significance

PJ Feczko, MA Bernstein, RD Halpert and LV Ackerman

With the advent of fiberoptic endoscopy and modern radiographic techniques, the majority of detected polyps are less than 1 cm. During a seven-month period, we studied 140 patients who had radiographically demonstrated colonic polyps that were confirmed by pathologic study. Tissue specimens were obtained by proctoscopy, colonoscopy, or surgery. There were 222 polyps of which 144 (65%) were 1 cm or less in size, with the preponderance (80%) of these being adenomatous. Of the 82 polyps that ranged in size from 6-10 mm, 68 (83%) were adenomas, including one carcinoma and five villous adenomas. Forty-seven (72%) of the diminutive polyps (less than or equal to 5 mm) were adenomatous, including two with atypia. Our results correspond to those of several recent endoscopic studies, reporting that a small colonic polyp is most likely to be adenomatous, and that it possesses the potential for growth and malignant transformation. The detection of small polyps during barium enema examination is thus warranted, particularly in the proximal colon where the majority are adenomatous. The clinical management of polyps is becoming more aggressive, and the removal of even small lesions (less than or equal to 5 mm) is now performed if they are found incidentally during colonoscopy.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. S. Levine, S. E. Rubesin, I. Laufer, and H. Herlinger
Diagnosis of Colorectal Neoplasms at Double-Contrast Barium Enema Examination
Radiology, July 1, 2000; 216(1): 11 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1984 by the Radiological Society of North America.