Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kinney, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by Fogarty, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kinney, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by Fogarty, T. J.

Radiology, Vol 153, 85-89, Copyright © 1984 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Transluminal angioplasty: a mechanical-pathophysiological correlation of its physical mechanisms

TB Kinney, AK Chin, GW Rurik, JC Finn, PM Shoor, WG Hayden and TJ Fogarty

We quantitatively determined the relative contribution of various factors leading to arterial lumen enlargement during transluminal angioplasty. Mechanical tests were conducted on both normal and atherosclerotic artery necropsy specimens. In our range of dilating pressures (0-3.4 atm or 0-50 lb/in2), content extrusion of fluid from the plaque accounted for 6-12% of the overall lumen area increase, while compaction of the plaque accounted for only 1-1.5%. The majority of the increase, 86.8-93%, was due to plaque and arterial wall disruption. The mechanism of disruption began with shearing of the plaque from the underlying artery at relatively low dilating pressures and continued with longitudinal tearing and stretching of the arterial wall at higher pressures. Diseased arteries dilated significantly more than nondiseased arteries at dilating pressures greater than or equal to 1.36 atm or 20 lb/in2 (P less than .05). In the range of stenoses that were tested (10-50%), the mean dilating pressure required to increase the lumen cross-sectional area by 50% was approximately 1.5 atm or 22 lb/in2.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
D. R. Whittaker and M. F. Fillinger
The Engineering of Endovascular Stent Technology: A Review
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, March 1, 2006; 40(2): 85 - 94.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. Nomori, H. Horio, and K. Suemasu
Daily and long-term balloon dilation via minitracheostomy in cicatric bronchial stenosis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1998; 66(6): 2100 - 2102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1984 by the Radiological Society of North America.