Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Droege, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Rzeszotarski, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Droege, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Rzeszotarski, M. S.

Radiology, Vol 153, 425-433, Copyright © 1984 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

A strategy for magnetic resonance imaging of the head: results of a semi-empirical model. Part II

RT Droege, SN Wiener and MS Rzeszotarski

A semi-empirical model was used to identify specific pulse sequences that cause most lesions to appear distinctly brighter than normal tissues in magnetic resonance (MR) images of the head. Clinical trials confirm the utility of these sequences for patient screening. As a result, a strategy for effective and efficient MR imaging of the head is proposed. The previously described gray-scale model has been modified to account for the effect of image noise. By means of computer simulation, 13,800 different hypothetical cerebral lesions were imaged with a variety of pulse sequences. A number of conclusions resulted. First, two sequences are expected to be sufficient to visualize most intracranial lesions, a "diagonal" SE sequence (e.g., SE 2500/80) and an IR sequence with a short inversion time (e.g., IR 1800/200). These sequences are orthogonal, i.e., lesions missed by one are likely to be detected by the other. Second, signal averaging the screening sequences is expected to be more effective than optimized sequences when lesion tissue parameters differ little from brain. Finally, the effectiveness of unaveraged screening sequences suggests that improved signal-to- noise ratio (SNR) is not necessary for the detection of most large lesions. Therefore, the increased SNR achievable through signal averaging or increased field strength might best be utilized to improve spatial resolution so that smaller lesions can be detected.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1984 by the Radiological Society of North America.