Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Slovis, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Corbett, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Slovis, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Corbett, D. P.

Radiology, Vol 153, 659-665, Copyright © 1984 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Renal transplant rejection: sonographic evaluation in children

TL Slovis, DS Babcock, H Hricak, BK Han, G Rose, P McEnery, J Muz, CH Chang, LE Fleischman and DP Corbett

The ability to detect renal rejection sonographically was studied in 42 pediatric renal transplant patients over a 33-month period. Sonography was not helpful in detecting rejection when the donor was less than five years of age. When the donor was over five years of age, a combination of sonographic findings allowed detection of rejection with a greater specificity than has been reported previously. The combination of three or more of the sonographic findings (increased renal volume 30% over the baseline value; enlarged, broadened, rectangular medullary pyramids [rays]; a reduction or absence of the central sinus echoes, and altered echogenicity in the renal parenchyma) indicated rejection with 97% specificity and 58% sensitivity. Radionuclide imaging with Tc-99m DTPA gave approximately the same sensitivity (60%) but was less specific (88%). By excluding rejection with the absence of the sonographic findings, it was possible to suggest acute tubular necrosis in some patients. It was also possible to detect the complications of renal transplantation, but sonography did not detect small ruptures of the kidney as a part of the rejection phenomenon.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
A. M. de Gaetano, G. Boldrini, G. Nanni, F. Serino, I. Giovannini, and M. Castagneto
Noninvasive Surveillance of Allografted Kidneys by Ultrasonic Duplex Scanning
Angiology, August 1, 1989; 40(8): 705 - 715.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1984 by the Radiological Society of North America.