|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 154, 11-13, Copyright © 1985 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
A de Roos, J Hermans, PC Shaw and H Kroon
Single-contrast (SC) and double-contrast (DC) colon examinations were compared in 425 consecutive patients for detection of polyps and stricturing carcinomas. Each patient was examined with both SC and DC during the same session. In patients with carcinoma, there was no significant difference between the two modalities. DC was far superior to SC for detection of rectal or colonic polyps (p less than 0.05); however, the techniques appeared to be complementary in the sigmoid and cecum. The authors conclude that DC is superior to SC as a means of screening for polyps of the rectum and colon, with SC being useful as an adjunct in problem areas such as the sigmoid and cecum.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Yee CT Screening for Colorectal Cancer RadioGraphics, November 1, 2002; 22(6): 1525 - 1531. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Yee, G. A. Akerkar, R. K. Hung, A. M. Steinauer-Gebauer, S. D. Wall, and K. R. McQuaid Colorectal Neoplasia: Performance Characteristics of CT Colonography for Detection in 300 Patients Radiology, June 1, 2001; 219(3): 685 - 692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. L. England, J. J. Halls, and V. B. Hunt Strategies for Screening for Colorectal Carcinoma Med Decis Making, February 1, 1989; 9(1): 3 - 13. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |