Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hall, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kilcoyne, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hall, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kilcoyne, R. F.

Radiology, Vol 154, 339-341, Copyright © 1985 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Shoulder arthrography: comparison of morbidity after use of various contrast media

FM Hall, RP Goldberg, G Wyshak and RF Kilcoyne

This prospective study compares immediate and delayed patient discomfort in 177 patients following shoulder arthrography using intraarticular combinations of metrizamide, meglumine/sodium diatrizoate, meglumine diatrizoate, lidocaine, epinephrine, and air. Patients receiving conventional ionic monomeric positive contrast media had a 60% (90/150) incidence of moderate or severe delayed exacerbation of their baseline symptoms; only 14% (3/21) of patients receiving metrizamide, a nonionic contrast medium, had similar levels of postprocedural discomfort. Morbidity was somewhat diminished with the use of double-contrast (45%, 34/75) rather than single-contrast (75%, 56/75) examinations, and with avoidance of sodium-containing contrast agents or epinephrine. Nonionic or monovalent polymeric contrast media, despite their present high cost, may be the agents of choice if single- contrast arthrography is performed in joints (such as the shoulder, hip, and temporomandibular) associated with a high incidence of post- procedural pain.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. A. Jacobson, J. Lin, D. A. Jamadar, and C. W. Hayes
Aids to Successful Shoulder Arthrography Performed with a Fluoroscopically Guided Anterior Approach
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2003; 23(2): 373 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. A. Binkert, M. Zanetti, and J. Hodler
Patient's Assessment of Discomfort during MR Arthrography of the Shoulder
Radiology, December 1, 2001; 221(3): 775 - 778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1985 by the Radiological Society of North America.