Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doubilet, P.
Right arrow Articles by Abrams, H. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doubilet, P.
Right arrow Articles by Abrams, H. L.

Radiology, Vol 154, 607-611, Copyright © 1985 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Excretory urography in current practice: evidence against overutilization

P Doubilet, BJ McNeil, FX Van Houten, A Berenberg, S Ratnofsky, RA Greenes, JW Anderson, HZ Mellins and HL Abrams

Excretory urography could be performed less frequently if some combinations of genitourinary signs and symptoms were found to be predictive of either a specific disease or normality. To explore this possibility, the authors conducted a prospective study involving more than 3,000 patients at three institutions (a teaching hospital, a community hospital, and a health maintenance organization). Predictive algorithms were obtained by application of a polychotomous logistic regression model but did poorly at differentiating normal from abnormal patients or arriving at a specific diagnosis. Selection of patients on the basis of the logistic model would have required testing 90% of all patients in order to detect 95% of those with abnormal urograms. These results suggest that current clinical selection criteria for excretory urography are effective, and that present frequency of utilization is appropriate.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1985 by the Radiological Society of North America.