Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soulen, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, C. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soulen, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, C. B.

Radiology, Vol 154, 705-707, Copyright © 1985 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Magnetic resonance imaging of prosthetic heart valves

RL Soulen, TF Budinger and CB Higgins

To evaluate the safety of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of prosthetic heart valves, nine different synthetic and tissue valves were studied ex vivo. Deflection was measured in 0.35-tesla (T) and 1.5-T superconducting magnets and at the edge of the bore of a 2.35-T electromagnet in field gradients of 5, 1.1, and 6.3 mT/cm, respectively. No valve deflected in the 0.35-T magnet; six synthetic valves deflected 0.25 degrees-3 degrees in the 1.5-T magnet; all valves deflected 1 degree-27 degrees at the edge of the 2.35-T magnet. Each valve was then submerged in a vial of water and the temperature was measured immediately before and after each of two spin-echo imaging sequences in the two superconducting magnets. No significant temperature rise followed exposure in either magnet. Image distortion varied from negligible to severe in both imagers; magnitude of distortion paralleled magnitude of deflection. These data suggest that patients with present-day prosthetic heart valves can be safely imaged in present-day MR imagers and that prosthesis-induced artifacts will not interfere with interpretation in most instances.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. N. Levine, A. S. Gomes, A. E. Arai, D. A. Bluemke, S. D. Flamm, E. Kanal, W. J. Manning, E. T. Martin, J. M. Smith, N. Wilke, et al.
Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cardiovascular Devices: An American Heart Association Scientific Statement From the Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Circulation, December 11, 2007; 116(24): 2878 - 2891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. G. Shellock and J. V. Crues
MR Procedures: Biologic Effects, Safety, and Patient Care
Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 635 - 652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Hug, E. Nagel, A. Bornstedt, B. Schnackenburg, H. Oswald, and E. Fleck
Coronary Arterial Stents: Safety and Artifacts during MR Imaging
Radiology, September 1, 2000; 216(3): 781 - 787.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. Weishaupt, H. H. Quick, D. Nanz, M. Schmidt, P. C. Cassina, and J. F. Debatin
Ligating Clips for Three-dimensional MR Angiography at 1.5 T: In Vitro Evaluation
Radiology, March 1, 2000; 214(3): 902 - 907.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. R. Hilfiker, H. H. Quick, and J. F. Debatin
Plain and Covered Stent-Grafts: In Vitro Evaluation of Characteristics at Three-dimensional MR Angiography
Radiology, June 1, 1999; 211(3): 693 - 697.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
W. Vongpatanasin, L. D. Hillis, and R. A. Lange
Prosthetic Heart Valves
N. Engl. J. Med., August 8, 1996; 335(6): 407 - 416.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1985 by the Radiological Society of North America.