|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 154, 705-707, Copyright © 1985 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
RL Soulen, TF Budinger and CB Higgins
To evaluate the safety of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of prosthetic heart valves, nine different synthetic and tissue valves were studied ex vivo. Deflection was measured in 0.35-tesla (T) and 1.5-T superconducting magnets and at the edge of the bore of a 2.35-T electromagnet in field gradients of 5, 1.1, and 6.3 mT/cm, respectively. No valve deflected in the 0.35-T magnet; six synthetic valves deflected 0.25 degrees-3 degrees in the 1.5-T magnet; all valves deflected 1 degree-27 degrees at the edge of the 2.35-T magnet. Each valve was then submerged in a vial of water and the temperature was measured immediately before and after each of two spin-echo imaging sequences in the two superconducting magnets. No significant temperature rise followed exposure in either magnet. Image distortion varied from negligible to severe in both imagers; magnitude of distortion paralleled magnitude of deflection. These data suggest that patients with present-day prosthetic heart valves can be safely imaged in present-day MR imagers and that prosthesis-induced artifacts will not interfere with interpretation in most instances.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. N. Levine, A. S. Gomes, A. E. Arai, D. A. Bluemke, S. D. Flamm, E. Kanal, W. J. Manning, E. T. Martin, J. M. Smith, N. Wilke, et al. Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cardiovascular Devices: An American Heart Association Scientific Statement From the Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Circulation, December 11, 2007; 116(24): 2878 - 2891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. G. Shellock and J. V. Crues MR Procedures: Biologic Effects, Safety, and Patient Care Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 635 - 652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hug, E. Nagel, A. Bornstedt, B. Schnackenburg, H. Oswald, and E. Fleck Coronary Arterial Stents: Safety and Artifacts during MR Imaging Radiology, September 1, 2000; 216(3): 781 - 787. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. Weishaupt, H. H. Quick, D. Nanz, M. Schmidt, P. C. Cassina, and J. F. Debatin Ligating Clips for Three-dimensional MR Angiography at 1.5 T: In Vitro Evaluation Radiology, March 1, 2000; 214(3): 902 - 907. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. R. Hilfiker, H. H. Quick, and J. F. Debatin Plain and Covered Stent-Grafts: In Vitro Evaluation of Characteristics at Three-dimensional MR Angiography Radiology, June 1, 1999; 211(3): 693 - 697. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W. Vongpatanasin, L. D. Hillis, and R. A. Lange Prosthetic Heart Valves N. Engl. J. Med., August 8, 1996; 335(6): 407 - 416. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |