Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mahony, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Callen, P. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mahony, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Callen, P. W.

Radiology, Vol 155, 205-209, Copyright © 1985 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Amnionicity and chorionicity in twin pregnancies: prediction using ultrasound

BS Mahony, RA Filly and PW Callen

A total of 66 twin pregnancies was studied antenatally with ultrasound, followed up clinically, and the placentae examined pathologically to determine if, solely on the basis of antenatal sonography, an accurate assessment of amnionicity and chorionicity could be made. Sonographic features noted included number of placental sites, whether a membrane separating the fetuses could be visualized, fetal position and amount of amniotic fluid, and in some cases fetal positioning vis-a-vis each other and the uterine wall. Documentation of two placental sites confirms the presence of a dichorionic and, therefore, a diamniotic pregnancy. Documentation of a membrane separating the fetuses confirms the presence of a diamniotic pregnancy; lack of visualization of a separating membrane does not reliably predict, but does suggest, a monoamniotic pregnancy. Other features frequently assist in prediction of amnionicity, chorionicity, and zygosity; the most helpful of these was the "stuck twin" sign, in which one twin moved freely but the other remained in a fixed position adjacent to the sidewall of the uterus despite changes in maternal positioning, indicating the presence of a nonvisualized membrane. Presence of absence of entanglement or intermingling of fetal parts or umbilical cords may also be helpful. In the absence of such sonographic features, antenatal sonographic diagnosis of a monoamniotic pregnancy cannot be made reliably.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E.S. Sills, M. Moomjy, N. Zaninovic, L. L. Veeck, M. McGee, G. D. Palermo, and Z. Rosenwaks
Human zona pellucida micromanipulation and monozygotic twinning frequency after IVF
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2000; 15(4): 890 - 895.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1985 by the Radiological Society of North America.