Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Muller, N. L.
Right arrow Articles by Webb, W. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Muller, N. L.
Right arrow Articles by Webb, W. R.

Radiology, Vol 155, 687-690, Copyright © 1985 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Pulmonary nodules: detection using magnetic resonance and computed tomography

NL Muller, G Gamsu and WR Webb

Detection of pulmonary nodules using spin-echo magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was compared with detection using computed tomography (CT). Of the 25 patients studied independently by two radiologists, no lung nodules were detected in 11 (CT or MR), ten had a single nodule, and four had multiple nodules. The lesions not seen using CT or MR were less than 1.3 cm in diameter. The greater spatial resolution of CT enabled better detection of nodules close to the diaphragm, the pleura, or to each other, whereas the better contrast resolution of MR enabled the detection of several nodules close to blood vessels. With MR, nodules were best seen on images with long repetition times (2.0 sec). Most pulmonary nodules are seen using both CT and MR. CT generally enables the detection of more small nodules than MR does, and some low- density nodules near blood vessels are better displayed using MR.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. M. Vogt, C. U. Herborn, P. Hunold, T. C. Lauenstein, T. Schroder, J. F. Debatin, and J. Barkhausen
HASTE MRI Versus Chest Radiography in the Detection of Pulmonary Nodules: Comparison with MDCT
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2004; 183(1): 71 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
N. Karabulut, D. R. Martin, M. Yang, and R. J. Tallaksen
MR Imaging of the Chest Using a Contrast-Enhanced Breath-Hold Modified Three-Dimensional Gradient-Echo Technique: Comparison with Two-Dimensional Gradient-Echo Technique and Multidetector CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2002; 179(5): 1225 - 1233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1985 by the Radiological Society of North America.