Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rao, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Steiner, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rao, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Steiner, R. M.

Radiology, Vol 156, 311-313, Copyright © 1985 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Inhibition of platelet function by contrast media: iopamidol and ioxaglate versus iothalamate. Work in progress

AK Rao, VM Rao, J Willis, C Beckett and RM Steiner

The effects of an ionic contrast agent, meglumine iothalamate (Conray- 60), and two newer low-osmolality radiographic contrast media, sodium meglumine ioxaglate (Hexabrix) and iopamidol (B-15,000), on platelet aggregation and secretion responses were studied. All three agents inhibited platelet responses during stimulation with adenosine diphosphate (ADP), epinephrine, and collagen. Platelet function was inhibited by iothalamate at concentrations of 11 mg iodine/ml and above, and by the newer agents at concentrations above 30 mg iodine/ml. Addition of exogenous calcium decreased the iothalamate-induced inhibition of aggregation but did not improve dense granule secretion. There was no consistent effect of exogenous calcium on platelet inhibition by iopamidol and ioxaglate. These studies indicate that the newer agents inhibit platelet function less than iothalamate does, and that chelation of Ca2+ may not be the major mechanism of platelet inhibition by contrast agents.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1985 by the Radiological Society of North America.