Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Welch, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by McGill, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Welch, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by McGill, D. B.

Radiology, Vol 156, 593-595, Copyright © 1985 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma: comparison of angiography, CT, US, and scintigraphy

TJ Welch, PF Sheedy 2d, CM Johnson, DH Stephens, JW Charboneau, ML Brown, GR May, MA Adson and DB McGill

The authors reviewed 23 cases of focal nodular hyperplasia and 13 cases of hepatic adenoma, all of which were confirmed pathologically. All solitary masses that exhibited normal or increased uptake of technetium 99m-sulfur colloid were shown to be hyperplasia; while previous criteria such as a central blood supply on angiograms or a central scar on computed tomography (CT) or ultrasound (US) scans were helpful, they were relatively infrequent. A mass that was slightly hypodense and homogeneous on a CT or US scan and highly vascular with an intense capillary stain on an angiogram was almost always hyperplasia. Acute hemorrhage within a focal hepatic tumor was common in adenoma but did not occur in hyperplasia.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. M. Dickson
The Focal Hepatic Hot Spot Sign
Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 647 - 648.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. von Herbay, C. Vogt, and D. Haussinger
Late-Phase Pulse-Inversion Sonography Using the Contrast Agent Levovist: Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Focal Lesions of the Liver
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2002; 179(5): 1273 - 1279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
T.-M. Chen, S.-N. Lu, J.-H. Wang, C.-H. Hung, and H.-D. Tung
Relationship Between Flash Echo Gray Scale Imaging Features and Pathologic Findings in Hepatic Adenoma
J. Ultrasound Med., July 1, 2002; 21(7): 821 - 824.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. Brancatelli, M. P. Federle, S. Katyal, and V. Kapoor
Hemodynamic Characterization of Focal Nodular Hyperplasia Using Three-Dimensional Volume-Rendered Multidetector CT Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2002; 179(1): 81 - 85.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. J. Ruppert-Kohlmayr, M. M. Uggowitzer, C. Kugler, D. Zebedin, G. Schaffler, and G. S. Ruppert
Focal Nodular Hyperplasia and Hepatocellular Adenoma of the Liver: Differentiation with Multiphasic Helical CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2001; 176(6): 1493 - 1498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. Grazioli, M. P. Federle, T. Ichikawa, E. Balzano, M. Nalesnik, and J. Madariaga
Liver Adenomatosis: Clinical, Histopathologic, and Imaging Findings in 15 Patients
Radiology, August 1, 2000; 216(2): 395 - 402.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. K. Carlson, C. D. Johnson, C. E. Bender, and T. J. Welch
CT of Focal Nodular Hyperplasia of the Liver
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2000; 174(3): 705 - 712.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. Ichikawa, M. P. Federle, L. Grazioli, and M. Nalesnik
Hepatocellular Adenoma: Multiphasic CT and Histopathologic Findings in 25 Patients
Radiology, March 1, 2000; 214(3): 861 - 868.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. M. Leifer, W. D. Middleton, S. A. Teefey, C. O. Menias, and J. R. Leahy
Follow-up of Patients at Low Risk for Hepatic Malignancy with a Characteristic Hemangioma at US1
Radiology, January 1, 2000; 214(1): 167 - 172.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. K. McLarney, P. T. Rucker, G. N. Bender, Z. D. Goodman, N. Kashitani, and P. R. Ros
From the Archives of the AFIP: Fibrolamellar Carcinoma of the Liver: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation
RadioGraphics, March 1, 1999; 19(2): 453 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
D. Delbeke, W. H. Martin, M. P. Sandler, W. C. Chapman, J. K. Wright Jr, and C. W. Pinson
Evaluation of Benign vs Malignant Hepatic Lesions With Positron Emission Tomography
Arch Surg, May 1, 1998; 133(5): 510 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. Grazioli, G. Morana, M. P. Federle, G. Brancatelli, M. Testoni, M. A. Kirchin, K. Menni, L. Olivetti, N. Nicoli, and C. Procacci
Focal Nodular Hyperplasia: Morphologic and Functional Information from MR Imaging with Gadobenate Dimeglumine
Radiology, December 1, 2001; 221(3): 731 - 739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1985 by the Radiological Society of North America.