Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eubanks, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Brant-Zawadzki, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eubanks, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Brant-Zawadzki, M.

Radiology, Vol 157, 243-246, Copyright © 1985 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

CT measurement of the diameter of spinal and other bony canals: effects of section angle and thickness

BA Eubanks, CE Cann and M Brant-Zawadzki

The effects of section angle and thickness on the measurement of spinal canal diameter by computed tomography (CT) were tested. A phantom of three spinal canals was constructed of three Lucite rods of different diameters, each covered with 1.8-mm-thick Teflon. A second phantom was constructed of two Lucite rods of the same diameter covered with 1.8- and 8.8-mm-thick Teflon, respectively. CT sections 10, 5, and 1.5 mm thick were obtained at various angles relative to the transverse plane of each canal. Anteroposterior diameters were measured at bone window settings using a standard software package and a method that uses a CT- number profile. Results show that sections obtained at an angle to the transverse plane of the canal do not always overestimate its diameter, as previously suggested, but can make it appear artifactually stenotic. The effect is from volume averaging and is most marked when thick, severely angled sections are used.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1985 by the Radiological Society of North America.