Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ferrucci, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by White, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ferrucci, J. T., Jr

Radiology, Vol 157, 431-436, Copyright © 1985 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Surface coil MR imaging of abdominal viscera. Part II. The adrenal glands

EM White, RR Edelman, DD Stark, JF Simeone, PR Mueller, TJ Brady, J Wittenberg, RJ Butch and JT Ferrucci Jr

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the adrenal glands with a prototype surface coil was compared with conventional body coil images in five healthy volunteers and 15 patients with adrenal disease. The spectrum of abnormalities included five nonfunctioning cortical adenomas, of which two were in hyperplastic glands, four adrenal metastases, three pheochromocytomas, a functioning adenoma, a myelolipoma, and a partially calcified, cystic adrenal mass. In both body and surface coil images, anatomic detail was superior on T1-weighted images compared with T2-weighted images obtained with identical imaging time because of decreased motion artifact and superior contrast. In the T1-weighted studies, high-resolution surface coil images showed a threefold improvement in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) over body coil images, which was manifest by better intrinsic resolution of small adrenal lesions and clearer definition of the extrinsic relationships of large masses to nearby organs. In addition, inferior vena caval invasion by two right adrenal metastases was better demonstrated using the surface coil than body coil MR or computed tomography (CT). Limitations of surface coil imaging include restriction in the field of view to a single gland and additional time required for patient positioning. Since the sensitivity of surface coils diminishes with depth, gains in SNR were limited in large patients with deeper adrenal glands. Despite these limitations, dramatic improvements in SNR and anatomic resolution indicate that surface coil MR imaging will be competitive with CT for examining the adrenal glands.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1985 by the Radiological Society of North America.