Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, C. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, C. B.

Radiology, Vol 157, 443-447, Copyright © 1985 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

MR imaging using specialized coils

MR Fisher, B Barker, EG Amparo, G Brandt, M Brant-Zawadzki, H Hricak and CB Higgins

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of specialized coils with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and to determine the potential improvement in the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) provided by the various coils. A total of 48 patients were studied-33 with surface coils and 15 with limb coils. MR imaging was performed with a superconducting magnet operating at 0.35 T. Two applications of surface coils were evaluated; one used for both transmitting and receiving and the other used only for receiving. Structures studied with the surface coils included the orbit, carotid artery, cervical and lumbar spine, parotid and thyroid glands, other neck structures, femoral artery, kidney, prostate, hip, and heart. The regions studied with the limb coil were the ankle, knee, wrist, elbow and popliteal artery. We calculated the SNR, and the results demonstrated a marked improvement with the specialized coils: a twofold increase for the 10-cm surface coil versus the head coil and a 4.6-fold increase compared with the body coil, a 2.3-fold increase for the 20-cm surface coil compared with the body coil, and 2.8- and 6.4-fold increases for the limb coil versus the head coil and the body coil, respectively. The use of specialized coils was feasible in the clinical setting and they provided a marked improvement in the image SNR, which facilitated the imaging of small and superficial structures.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1985 by the Radiological Society of North America.