Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Crooks, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Crooks, L. E.

Radiology, Vol 157, 467-470, Copyright © 1985 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Urinary bladder MR imaging. Part I. Normal and benign conditions

MR Fisher, H Hricak and LE Crooks

The normal urinary bladder and several benign entities of the bladder were examined in 50 patients by magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Specific features assessed included appearance of the bladder wall, optimal repetition (TR) and echo delay (TE) parameters for bladder-wall demonstration, and differentiation among various benign abnormalities, including bladder-wall hypertrophy, inflammation, and mucosal congestion, on MR images. The bladder wall in the 30 healthy subjects was best displayed using a TR = 2 sec, TE = 56 msec image, which gave 60% contrast between the bladder wall and urine and 48% contrast between the bladder wall and fat. Demonstration of bladder-wall hypertrophy required similar imaging; bladder distention was necessary to demonstrate the thickness of the bladder wall. Congestion and inflammation were best demonstrated on TR = 2 sec, TE = 56 msec images, which gave 45% contrast. Normal and/or hypertrophic bladder wall were distinguished from inflammation and congestion on the basis of signal intensity variations and/or T1 and T2 relaxation parameters.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1985 by the Radiological Society of North America.