Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Posin, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Posin, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, L.

Radiology, Vol 157, 679-683, Copyright © 1985 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Hydrogen MR imaging of the head at 0.35 T and 0.7 T: effects of magnetic field strength

JP Posin, M Arakawa, LE Crooks, DA Feinberg, JC Hoenninger, JC Watts, CM Mills and L Kaufman

To determine whether hydrogen magnetic resonance imaging at 0.7 T provides added clinical value over imaging at 0.35 T, images of the heads of patients with various intracranial disorders were obtained at these field strengths. Measurements of tissue contrast (C), signal-to- noise (S/N) ratio, and T1 and T2 relaxation times were determined. For a given spin-echo sequence with equal imaging time, resolution, and data sampling window, the product C X S/N was somewhat lower for the lower field strength. Under conditions of imaging with equal chemical shift artifact, C X S/N at 0.35 T was equal to or greater than that measured at 0.7 T. With an increase in field strength, T1 of pathologic areas and surrounding normal tissues increased, resulting in a corresponding loss of absolute signal level and decrease in contrast. Lesions were equally well seen at both 0.35 T and 0.7 T. The increased T1 and decreased C X S/N for higher magnetic fields--when measured with a fixed imaging time, resolution, chemical shift, and sequence--suggest that such field strengths may not improve tissue contrast, diagnostic ability, or clinical throughput when compared with lower field strength systems.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. Taouli, S. Zaim, C. G. Peterfy, J. A. Lynch, A. Stork, A. Guermazi, B. Fan, K. H. Fye, and H. K. Genant
Rheumatoid Arthritis of the Hand and Wrist: Comparison of Three Imaging Techniques
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2004; 182(4): 937 - 943.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1985 by the Radiological Society of North America.