Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seibert, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Baltaxe, H. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seibert, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Baltaxe, H. A.

Radiology, Vol 157, 807-811, Copyright © 1985 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Videodensitometric quantitation of stenosis: in vitro and in vivo validation

JA Seibert, DP Link, HH Hines and HA Baltaxe

Percentage of stenosis of a vascular lumen was quantitated using a digital subtraction angiography system with videodensitometric analysis. To validate the algorithm and methods, we used precisely drilled Lucite rods of three inner diameters and various reduced diameters to give known luminal reduction. Both in vitro and in vivo results of stenosis measurements resulted in an excellent correlation between actual and measured values (correlation coefficient greater than 0.9 for all trials). Consistent underestimation of stenosis of about 5% was attributed to the various image degradations inherent with the imaging procedure and equipment. Errors were greatest with midrange stenoses and less at the extremes of the lesion values. An insufficient signal-to-noise ratio was caused by low photon flux and/or low contrast material concentration and overlying vasculature filled with contrast material. Overall, the videodensitometric technique is accurate, easy to implement, objective, and relatively free of errors associated with the geometric/edge detection method.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1985 by the Radiological Society of North America.