Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Latack, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Aisen, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Latack, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Aisen, A. M.

Radiology, Vol 159, 159-163, Copyright © 1986 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Patients with partial seizures: evaluation by MR, CT, and PET imaging

JT Latack, BW Abou-Khalil, GJ Siegel, JC Sackellares, TO Gabrielsen and AM Aisen

Fifty patients who experienced partial seizures were imaged with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MR); 14 of these also had imaging studies of local cerebral glucose metabolism with positron emission tomography (PET). Thirteen patients with attenuation abnormalities on CT scans also had abnormal signals on MR images; ten other patients had MR-image signal abnormalities but normal CT scans. In all seven patients undergoing PET who had MR-signal and sometimes also CT-attenuation abnormalities, areas of metabolic asymmetry were present. Positive PET scans were also seen in three patients with no evidence of abnormality on CT and MR studies. Focal cerebral substance loss on CT and MR studies, present in 21 patients, did not correlate well with electroencephalographic findings. MR is utilized as the initial imaging procedure in patients with partial seizures because it is more readily available and less invasive than PET and more sensitive than CT scanning.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
U C Wieshmann
Clinical application of neuroimaging in epilepsy
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, April 1, 2003; 74(4): 466 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
F. Rosenow and H. Luders
Presurgical evaluation of epilepsy
Brain, September 1, 2001; 124(9): 1683 - 1700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
O. Muzik, E. A. da Silva, C. Juhasz, D. C. Chugani, J. Shah, F. Nagy, A. Canady, H.-M. von Stockhausen, K. Herholz, J. Gates, et al.
Intracranial EEG versus flumazenil and glucose PET in children with extratemporal lobe epilepsy
Neurology, January 11, 2000; 54(1): 171 - 171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
A. R. Riela, B. P. Sires, and J. Kiffin Penry
Transient Magnetic Resonance Imaging Abnormalities During Partial Status Epilepticus
J Child Neurol, April 1, 1991; 6(2): 143 - 145.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1986 by the Radiological Society of North America.