Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watt, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Wilderman, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Watt, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Wilderman, S. J.

Radiology, Vol 159, 39-42, Copyright © 1986 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Breast lesions: differential diagnosis using digital subtraction angiography

AC Watt, LV Ackerman, JP Windham, PC Shetty, MW Burke, MJ Flynn, C Grodinsky, G Fine and SJ Wilderman

To evaluate its potential for differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions, digital subtraction angiography of the breast (DSAB) was performed in 23 women with mammographic evidence of disease, and the results were compared with surgical biopsy findings. The DSAB technique employed breast immobilization with modest compression and bolus injection; following the injection of contrast material, 30-40 sequential subtraction images were obtained over a 5-minute interval. The average technical settings were 50 k Vp and 10 mAs, resulting in an estimated radiation dose to the breast of 0.05 mrad (0.5 mu Gy) per exposure. DSAB consistently demonstrated retention of contrast material and abnormal vasculature in malignant lesions but not in benign lesions. In the 22 breast lesions for which there was histopathologic correlation, DSAB correctly categorized eight of nine malignant and 11 of 13 benign lesions. Although this series is small, the initial results of DSAB suggest its potential for differentiating benign from malignant lesions.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. Dromain, C. Balleyguier, S. Muller, M.-C. Mathieu, F. Rochard, P. Opolon, and R. Sigal
Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast carcinoma using contrast-enhanced digital mammography.
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2006; 187(5): W528 - W537.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. A. Jong, M. J. Yaffe, M. Skarpathiotakis, R. S. Shumak, N. M. Danjoux, A. Gunesekara, and D. B. Plewes
Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography: Initial Clinical Experience
Radiology, September 1, 2003; 228(3): 842 - 850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1986 by the Radiological Society of North America.