Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cook, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Brewer, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cook, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Brewer, W. H.

Radiology, Vol 159, 65-69, Copyright © 1986 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Upper abdominal trauma: pitfalls in CT diagnosis

DE Cook, JW Walsh, CW Vick and WH Brewer

Medical records and computed tomographic (CT) scans of 83 patients with upper abdominal trauma were retrospectively reviewed to determine errors in diagnosis using CT. Patients with possible pancreatic injury, small bowel perforation, or injury to an occult malignancy represented the most difficult diagnostic cases. A false-positive diagnosis of pancreatic injury occurred in seven of 77 patients (9%) and represented the most frequent error in the series. In three patients with subsequently surgically proved small bowel perforation, one duodenal and two proximal jejunal, the injuries were not correctly diagnosed on CT scans. In retrospect, positive CT findings were present in the case of duodenal rupture. Additionally, in two patients, duodenal rupture was suspected based on CT findings of extraluminal gas and fluid near the duodenum, but both cases were proved normal at surgery. The series included three patients with trauma involving unsuspected tumors in the liver, kidney, and stomach.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Atri, J. M. Hanson, L. Grinblat, N. Brofman, T. Chughtai, and G. Tomlinson
Surgically Important Bowel and/or Mesenteric Injury in Blunt Trauma: Accuracy of Multidetector CT for Evaluation
Radiology, September 16, 2008; (2008) 2492072055.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. T. Butela, M. P. Federle, P. J. Chang, F. L. Thaete, M. S. Peterson, C. J. Dorvault, A. K. Hari, S. Soni, B. F. Branstetter, K. J. Paisley, et al.
Performance of CT in Detection of Bowel Injury
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2001; 176(1): 129 - 135.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. M. Brody, D. B. Leighton, B. L. Murphy, G. F. Abbott, J. P. Vaccaro, L. Jagminas, and W. G. Cioffi
CT of Blunt Trauma Bowel and Mesenteric Injury: Typical Findings and Pitfalls in Diagnosis
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2000; 20(6): 1525 - 1536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
R. E. Stafford, M. D. McGonigal, J. A. Weigelt, and T. J. Johnson
Oral Contrast Solution and Computed Tomography for Blunt Abdominal Trauma: A Randomized Study
Arch Surg, June 1, 1999; 134(6): 622 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1986 by the Radiological Society of North America.