Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by James, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Greeson, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by James, A. E., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Greeson, T.

Radiology, Vol 160, 411-413, Copyright © 1986 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Ectopic pregnancy: a malpractice paradigm

AE James Jr, AC Fleischer, GA Sacks and T Greeson

Subtle sonographic findings and other nonspecific clinical presentations often lead to missed diagnoses that can have significant legal implications. This communication discusses current diagnostic and laboratory methods used to evaluate patients with a suspected ectopic pregnancy in light of the concepts of "missed lesions" as they relate to negligence and malpractice theory.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Berlin
Accuracy of Diagnostic Procedures: Has It Improved Over the Past Five Decades?
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2007; 188(5): 1173 - 1178.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1986 by the Radiological Society of North America.