Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rigsby, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rigsby, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, K. J.

Radiology, Vol 162, 39-42, Copyright © 1987 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Doppler signal quantitation in renal allografts: comparison in normal and rejecting transplants, with pathologic correlation

CM Rigsby, PN Burns, GG Weltin, B Chen, M Bia and KJ Taylor

Quantitative duplex Doppler sonography was performed in 55 renal transplant patients during 54 independent episodes of acute rejection, three episodes of chronic rejection, three episodes of acute tubular necrosis (ATN), and 23 occasions of normal graft function. Doppler signals were obtained from four arterial sites in each kidney. Nine patients, in whom signals were absent, were subsequently shown at nephrectomy to have absence of perfusion resulting from severe acute vascular rejection. In each patient with graft dysfunction, biopsy or nephrectomy was performed within 24 hours of the Doppler study. Arterial Doppler signals were quantified using a pulsatility index (PI). Acute rejection produced a significantly higher PI at each arterial site. Receiver-operator characteristics suggest that signals obtained from the segmental arteries are most sensitive to these changes. With a threshold PI of 1.5, the sensitivity of this technique for detection of acute renal allograft rejection is 75%; the specificity is 90%. In acute vascular rejection, the same PI yields a sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 90%. With a cutoff PI of 1.8, a specificity of 100% can be achieved.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
B. N. Josiah JR, G. A. Rouse, and D. M. Williams
A Reevaluation of the Use of Sonography in the Renal Transplant
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, November 1, 1991; 7(6): 339 - 344.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
L. B. Newberry and R. C. Nelson
Duplex Sonography in the Evaluation of Pancreas Transplants
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, March 1, 1991; 7(2): 74 - 80.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
P. C. Smith
Noninvasive venous investigation
Vascular Medicine, September 1, 1990; 1(2): 139 - 166.
[PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
A. M. de Gaetano, G. Boldrini, G. Nanni, F. Serino, I. Giovannini, and M. Castagneto
Noninvasive Surveillance of Allografted Kidneys by Ultrasonic Duplex Scanning
Angiology, August 1, 1989; 40(8): 705 - 715.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1987 by the Radiological Society of North America.