Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jeffrey, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, F. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jeffrey, R. B., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, F. R.

Radiology, Vol 163, 11-14, Copyright © 1987 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Acute appendicitis: high-resolution real-time US findings

RB Jeffrey Jr, FC Laing and FR Lewis

High-resolution, real-time ultrasonography (US) with graded compression was used to evaluate 90 patients with clinically suspected acute appendicitis. US visualization of a noncompressible appendix was the primary criterion for a diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The overall sensitivity was 89%, the specificity was 95%, and the accuracy was 93%. When the results in women were analyzed separately (n = 49), the overall accuracy was 96%. Several important limitations of US scanning were encountered. There were three false-positive examinations in patients with a sonographically visible appendix whose symptoms spontaneously resolved. Another patient had a normal compressible appendix with a thin (2-mm), symmetric wall surrounded by ascites. There were three nondiagnostic studies (3%) due to inability to compress the cecum and right lower quadrant adequately because of exquisite tenderness (two patients) or massive ascites (one patient). When interpreted in light of the clinical examination, sonography should significantly reduce the rate of false-negative appendectomies, particularly in women.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Gaitini, N. Beck-Razi, D. Mor-Yosef, D. Fischer, O. B. Itzhak, M. M. Krausz, and A. Engel
Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis in Adults: Accuracy of Color Doppler Sonography and MDCT Compared with Surgery and Clinical Follow-Up
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1300 - 1306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
E M Anderson and H K Bungay
Imaging investigation of acute right iliac fossa pain
Imaging, December 1, 2006; 18(4): 257 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. H. Lee, Y. K. Jeong, K. B. Park, J. K. Park, A. K. Jeong, and J. C. Hwang
Operator-Dependent Techniques for Graded Compression Sonography to Detect the Appendix and Diagnose Acute Appendicitis
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2005; 184(1): 91 - 97.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
T. Terasawa, C. C. Blackmore, S. Bent, and R. J. Kohlwes
Systematic Review: Computed Tomography and Ultrasonography To Detect Acute Appendicitis in Adults and Adolescents
Ann Intern Med, October 5, 2004; 141(7): 537 - 546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. Kessler, C. Cyteval, B. Gallix, A. Lesnik, P.-M. Blayac, J. Pujol, J.-M. Bruel, and P. Taourel
Appendicitis: Evaluation of Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values of US, Doppler US, and Laboratory Findings
Radiology, February 1, 2004; 230(2): 472 - 478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
E. K. Paulson, M. F. Kalady, and T. N. Pappas
Suspected Appendicitis
N. Engl. J. Med., January 16, 2003; 348(3): 236 - 242.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. Rettenbacher, A. Hollerweger, P. Macheiner, N. Gritzmann, M. Daniaux, K. Schwamberger, H. Ulmer, and D. z. Nedden
Ovoid Shape of the Vermiform Appendix: A Criterion to Exclude Acute Appendicitis--Evaluation with US
Radiology, January 1, 2003; 226(1): 95 - 100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
O. Benjaminov, M. Atri, P. Hamilton, and D. Rappaport
Frequency of Visualization and Thickness of Normal Appendix at Nonenhanced Helical CT
Radiology, November 1, 2002; 225(2): 400 - 406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
V. Simonovsky
Normal Appendix: Is There Any Significant Difference in the Maximal Mural Thickness at US between Pediatric and Adult Populations?
Radiology, August 1, 2002; 224(2): 333 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
T. I. Han
Improved Sonographic Visualization of the Appendix With a Saline Enema in Children With Suspected Appendicitis
J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2002; 21(5): 511 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J.-H. Lee, Y. K. Jeong, J. C. Hwang, S. Y. Ham, and S.-O. Yang
Graded Compression Sonography with Adjuvant Use of a Posterior Manual Compression Technique in the Sonographic Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2002; 178(4): 863 - 868.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. W. Wise, M. R. Labuski, C. J. Kasales, J. S. Blebea, J. W. Meilstrup, G. P. Holley, S. A. LaRusso, J. Holliman, F. M. Ruggiero, and D. Mauger
Comparative Assessment of CT and Sonographic Techniques for Appendiceal Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2001; 176(4): 933 - 941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. Rettenbacher, A. Hollerweger, P. Macheiner, L. Rettenbacher, F. Tomaselli, B. Schneider, and N. Gritzmann
Outer Diameter of the Vermiform Appendix as a Sign of Acute Appendicitis: Evaluation at US
Radiology, March 1, 2001; 218(3): 757 - 762.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Baldisserotto and E. Marchiori
Accuracy of Noncompressive Sonography of Children with Appendicitis According to the Potential Positions of the Appendix
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2000; 175(5): 1387 - 1392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. A. Birnbaum and S. R. Wilson
Appendicitis at the Millennium
Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 337 - 348.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. P. Ledermann, N. Borner, H. Strunk, G. Bongartz, C. Zollikofer, and G. Stuckmann
Bowel Wall Thickening on Transabdominal Sonography
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2000; 174(1): 107 - 115.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. Rettenbacher, A. Hollerweger, P. Macheiner, L. Rettenbacher, R. Frass, B. Schneider, and N. Gritzmann
Presence or Absence of Gas in the Appendix: Additional Criteria to Rule Out or Confirm Acute Appendicitis-Evaluation with US1
Radiology, January 1, 2000; 214(1): 183 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
N. Damani and S. R. Wilson
Nongynecologic Applications of Transvaginal US
RadioGraphics, October 1, 1999; 19(90001): 179 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
C. L. Rapp, A. T. Stavros, and P. R. Meyers
Ultrasound of the Normal Appendix: The How and Why
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, September 1, 1998; 14(5): 195 - 201.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
D. M. Sherer and O. Abulafia
Unusual Sonographic Findings of Acute Appendicitis Mimicking Right Hydrosa lpinx
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, July 1, 1995; 11(4): 207 - 209.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
M. Gisler, G. Rouse, and M. DeLange
Sonography of Appendicitis: A Review
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, March 1, 1989; 5(2): 57 - 60.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1987 by the Radiological Society of North America.