Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mattrey, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Forsythe, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mattrey, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Forsythe, J.

Radiology, Vol 163, 339-343, Copyright © 1987 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Perfluorochemicals as US contrast agents for tumor imaging and hepatosplenography: preliminary clinical results

RF Mattrey, G Strich, RE Shelton, BB Gosink, GR Leopold, T Lee and J Forsythe

In animals, perfluorochemicals (PFCs) are effective ultrasound (US) contrast agents that produce hepatic, splenic, and tumor enhancement. The use of Fluosol-DA 20%, an emulsion of perfluorodecalin and perfluorotripropylamine, was studied in nine non-critically ill patients with cancer who had liver lesions. US studies without Fluosol were compared with studies obtained 24, 48, and 72 hours after Fluosol infusion. Vital signs and extensive laboratory analyses are performed before and after Fluosol infusion. Liver metastases from colonic, pancreatic, and gastric carcinoma exhibited rim or diffuse enhancement after a Fluosol dose of 1.6 g/kg or greater. Fluosol produced echogenic enhancement of the liver and spleen relative to kidney at a dose of 2.4 g/kg, allowing the detection of nonenhancing lesions. In addition, Fluosol at a dose of 1.6 g/kg or greater allowed detection of lesions not seen before contrast medium was administered in three of the seven patients studied. There was a mild increase in the level of serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase in two patients, one given 2.4 and the other 3.2 g/kg of Fluosol. Mild and transient allergic reactions without change in vital signs were experienced by two patients.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
J. S. Abramowicz
Ultrasonographic Contrast Media: Has the Time Come in Obstetrics and Gynecology?
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2005; 24(4): 517 - 531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
A. Marchbank
Fluorocarbon emulsions
Perfusion, March 1, 1995; 10(2): 67 - 88.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
A. H. Gobuty
Contrast Agents for Ultrasonic Diagnosis: A New Arena for Pharmacy
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, January 1, 1989; 2(3): 171 - 176.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1987 by the Radiological Society of North America.