Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bettmann, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Finkelstein, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bettmann, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Finkelstein, J.

Radiology, Vol 165, 113-116, Copyright © 1987 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Contrast venography of the leg: diagnostic efficacy, tolerance, and complication rates with ionic and nonionic contrast media

MA Bettmann, A Robbins, SD Braun, S Wetzner, NR Dunnick and J Finkelstein

A prospective, three-center study of two contrast agents for leg venography was performed to evaluate both the relative frequency of adverse effects and whether low-osmolality agents provided significant advantages for this procedure. Fifty-four patients were studied with the standard preparation (iothalamate meglumine) and 57 with a nonionic agent (iopamidol). Both were used at an iodine concentration of 200 mg/mL, and there were no differences in volume of contrast material, duration of infusion, percentage of positive studies, or overall diagnostic adequacy. Patient discomfort was less with iopamidol than with iothalamate (18% vs. 44%), although discomfort was generally mild in both groups. By objective follow-up studies, the frequency of postvenographic thrombosis was not significantly different in the two groups (8% vs. 9%). Contrast venography, then, had a low frequency of complications when either a dilute conventional or a low-osmolality agent was employed. Although the frequency of postvenographic thrombosis was low with both agents, patient discomfort was less with the low-osmolality formulation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E.-M. Larsson, P. Sunden, C.-G. Olsson, J. Debatin, A. J. Duerinckx, R. Baum, D. Hahn, and F. Ebner
MR Venography Using an Intravascular Contrast Agent: Results from a Multicenter Phase 2 Study of Dosage
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2003; 180(1): 227 - 232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
T. J. Kroencke, M. Taupitz, R. Arnold, L. Fritsche, and B. Hamm
Three-Dimensional Gadolinium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Venography in Suspected Thrombo-occlusive Disease of the Central Chest Veins
Chest, November 1, 2001; 120(5): 1570 - 1576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. E. Blum and H. Handmaker
1999 Plenary Session: Friday Imaging Symposium : Role of Small-Peptide Radiopharmaceuticals in the Evaluation of Deep Venous Thrombosis
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2000; 20(4): 1187 - 1193.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. G. Ruehm, W. Wiesner, and J. F. Debatin
Pelvic and Lower Extremity Veins: Contrast-enhanced Three-dimensional MR Venography with a Dedicated Vascular Coil-Initial Experience
Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 421 - 427.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
E. A. SALVATI, V. D. PELLEGRINI, N. E. SHARROCK, P. A. LOTKE, D. W. MURRAY, H. POTTER, and G. H. WESTRICH
Symposium - Recent Advances in Venous Thromboembolic Prophylaxis During and After Total Hip Replacement
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2000; 82(2): 252 - 70.
[Full Text]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
L. R. Dolovich, J. S. Ginsberg, J. D. Douketis, A. M. Holbrook, and G. Cheah
A Meta-analysis Comparing Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins With Unfractionated Heparin in the Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism: Examining Some Unanswered Questions Regarding Location of Treatment, Product Type, and Dosing Frequency
Arch Intern Med, January 24, 2000; 160(2): 181 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. D. Fraser and D. R. Anderson
Deep Venous Thrombosis: Recent Advances and Optimal Investigation with US
Radiology, April 1, 1999; 211(1): 9 - 24.
[Full Text]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
M. Ciavolella, R. Tavolaro, M. Di Loreto, F. La Torre, A. Nicolai, O. Schillaci, M. Ierardi, F. Scopinaro, and M. Ciavolella
Immunoscintigraphy of Venous Thrombi: Clinical Effectiveness of a New Antifibrin D-Dimer Monoclonal Antibody
Angiology, February 1, 1999; 50(2): 103 - 109.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
J.-L. Cracowski, J.-L. Bosson, F. Baloul, C. Moirant, M. Hunt, P. Merloz, P. Carpentier, and A. Franco
Early development of deep-vein thrombosis following hip fracture surgery: the role of venous wall thickening detected by B-mode ultrasonography
Vascular Medicine, November 1, 1998; 3(4): 269 - 274.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
C. McCollum
Avoiding the consequences of deep vein thrombosis
BMJ, September 12, 1998; 317(7160): 696 - 697.
[Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
E. E. Weinmann and E. W. Salzman
Deep-Vein Thrombosis
N. Engl. J. Med., December 15, 1994; 331(24): 1630 - 1641.
[Full Text]


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
P. C. Smith
Noninvasive venous investigation
Vascular Medicine, September 1, 1990; 1(2): 139 - 166.
[PDF]


Home page
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THERHome page
H. C. Redman and G. L. Miller
Water-Soluble Radiographic Contrast Media: Ionic vs. Nonionic
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, January 1, 1990; 3(2): 45 - 55.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1987 by the Radiological Society of North America.